EVIDENCE-BASED HOME VISITING PROGRAMS
WHAT ARE EVIDENCE-BASED HOME VISITING PROGRAMS AND WHY ARE THEY IMPORTANT?
Home visiting programs, which provide support and education to parents in the home through a trained professional (e.g., nurse or social worker) or paraprofessional, have expanded over the last couple of decades as a state-based investment to support parents and children.1
Supporting Families in the Early Years Produces Long-Term Benefits
Parents play a critical role in shaping children’s early development.2 Positive long-term child development is promoted through improving parents’ knowledge, social support, and coping and problem-solving skills, as well as connecting families to community and health resources during the prenatal and early childhood periods.3 In addition, teaching parents the skills for warm and responsive caregiving can buffer the long-term negative effects of childhood stress and adversity.4
Traditional and Virtual Home Visiting Services Provide Multiple Ways to Keep Families Engaged
For some families, the convenience of home-based service delivery can maximize the likelihood that they will participate in services by eliminating or reducing barriers such as transportation costs and child care needs.5 In-home support may make it easier for the entire family to participate, and this delivery method may facilitate more personalized, individual attention, which potentially increases families’ engagement in the programs.6
Further increasing accessibility, many home visiting programs have added options for virtual sessions. The availability of virtual sessions, although not yet studied rigorously, makes home visiting an option even to those who may have opted out of traditional home visiting services because of personal or cultural preferences.
Rigorous Research Demonstrates Home Visiting Programs Build Parenting Skills
Many home visiting programs have been evaluated with randomized controlled trials across a range of child and family outcomes. Although rigorous research has examined the impact of home visiting on a range of outcomes, the scope of this review is intentionally limited to parenting outcomes, the policy goal for which the most evidence on home visiting exists.
16 Home Visiting Program Models are Designated as Effective at Enhancing Parenting Skills
The Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness (HomVEE) project thoroughly reviews early childhood home visiting programs that serve families with expectant and new parents and their young children. Program models are designated as evidence-based if they meet the rigorous HomVEE criteria for evidence of effectiveness. States must use the vast majority of the MIECHV funds they receive from the federal Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) on programs designated as evidence-based and can allocate a small portion to promising programs that will be evaluated.
HomVEE identifies 21 evidence-based program models as having favorable impacts on parenting skills. Two programs, Early Start (New Zealand) and Preparing for Life (Ireland) do not operate in the US, and another, the Home Instruction for Parents of Preschool Youngsters (HIPPY), has only been evaluated for its impacts on preschoolers. Additionally, HealthySteps and Family Connects are considered “low touch” in service delivery, and thus more closely align with comprehensive screening and connection programs than evidence-based home visiting programs.
The remaining 16 evidence-based home visiting program models listed below are designed for pregnant women or infants and toddlers, have a significant impact on improving parenting skills, are “high touch,” and operate in the US:
- Attachment & BioBehavioral Catch-Up,
- Early Head Start-Home Based Option,
- Family Check-Up for Children,
- Family Spirit,
- Healthy Beginnings,
- Healthy Families America (HFA),
- Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT),
- Maternal Early Childhood Sustained HV Program (MESCH),
- Maternal Infant Health Outreach Worker (MIHOW),
- Nurse-Family Partnership,
- Oklahoma’s Community-Based Family Resource and Support (CBFRS) Program,
- Parents as Teachers,
- Play and Learning Strategies (PALS) – Infant,
- Promoting First Relationships – Home Visiting Intervention Model,
- Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting-Sensitive Discipline® (VIPP-SD), and
- Video-Feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting (VIPP).
Search the Prenatal-to-3 Policy Clearinghouse for an ongoing inventory of rigorous evidence reviews, including more information on evidence-based home visiting programs.
WHAT IMPACT DO EVIDENCE-BASED HOME VISITING PROGRAMS HAVE AND FOR WHOM?
Participation in evidence-based home visiting programs leads to small but positive impacts on parenting skills, however these effects exist within the context of many more null findings. Impacts are inconsistent across program models on other important child and family outcomes, including birth outcomes,7,8 child maltreatment,9,10 and child health.11,12 Given the lack of robust evidence for non-parenting outcomes, our evidence review focuses only on the impact of home visiting on parenting outcomes.
More Research Is Needed to Understand the Potential of Home Visiting Programs to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities
Most of the research on parenting outcomes in home visiting programs either does not examine impacts by race and ethnicity, or no significant differences emerge in subgroup analyses. Research does suggest that matching clients and home visitors on race and/or ethnicity can have better effects on birth outcomes, but this finding does not hold for parenting outcomes.13 Future studies should examine differential impacts of evidence-based home visiting programs based on race and ethnicity.
For more information on what we know and what we still need to learn about evidence-based home visiting programs, see the evidence review on evidence-based home visiting programs.
WHAT IS THE KEY POLICY LEVER TO INCREASE ACCESS TO EVIDENCE-BASED HOME VISITING PROGRAMS?
The current evidence base does not identify a specific policy lever that states should adopt to ensure access to home visiting programs to all families who need the services.
We identified one key policy lever that states can implement to increase access to home visiting programs:
- Use Medicaid to fund evidence-based home visiting programs that promote parenting skills.
Key Policy Lever: Use Medicaid to Fund Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs that Promote Parenting Skills
Although there are multiple avenues for states to support home visiting, components of home visiting programs may be covered by Medicaid funding. Additionally, because coverage of home visiting program services under Medicaid must be outlined in a state’s Section 1115 waiver or state plan amendment, there are consistent data sources to determine which states use Medicaid. Other funding options for evidence-based home visiting programs lack consistently available data on use by states.
States use their Medicaid dollars in a variety of ways to support home visiting. Home visiting is not a service that by itself is reimbursed by Medicaid, but components of the programs and services provided in the home visit can be covered by Medicaid. The targeted case management (TCM) benefit, through a state plan amendment, is one of the most common ways states have funded a part of home visiting through Medicaid. Other states use waivers—such as the Section 1115 or 1915(b) waivers—to pilot approaches for specific children or specific communities, or to integrate home visiting into Medicaid managed care arrangements.
As of September 2025, 19 states use Medicaid as a source of funding for evidence-based home visiting programs that are proven to impact parenting and two states (the District of Columbia and Nebraska) are taking steps to do so.
Changes to Medicaid funding at the federal level may impact Medicaid coverage and services of evidence-based programs such as home visiting. Work to determine the full impact of federal Medicaid changes on state offerings is ongoing.
States Can Use a Variety of Funding Mechanisms to Improve Access to Home Visiting Programs
Beyond Medicaid, states use a variety of funding mechanisms, including both federal and state funds, to fund their home visiting programs. The primary federal mechanism is the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting (MIECHV) program. States receive a base funding allotment based on the number of children in the state, if they appropriate at least the same level of state funding to home visiting as they did in either Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 or 2021. Beginning in FY2024, states and jurisdictions are also eligible for matching funds on top of their base allotment.
States may use other federal funding streams to support home visiting as well, including Medicaid, Title V Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant, Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), Child Welfare, Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP), and Head Start funds. These federal funds generally require state matching funds.
State funding streams include state general revenue, Children’s Trust Funds, tobacco settlements and taxes, and money from states’ cannabis accounts. By allocating additional resources beyond federal MIECHV funds, states can support programs and expand the reach of services. Currently, at least 26 states do so; however, it is not clear which portion of these funds is directed toward evidence-based home visiting programs.
For more information on the state policy levers that may help improve parenting through evidence-based home visiting programs see our State Policy Lever Checklists.
HOW DOES ACCESS TO EVIDENCE-BASED HOME VISITING VARY ACROSS STATES?
States vary considerably in the amount and type of investments they make in home visiting programs, which leads to variation in the percentage of children under age 3 who are served. The National Home Visiting Resource Center (NHVRC) collects data from most evidence-based program models to describe the models that are implemented in each state and the number of children under age 3 that are served by each program model.14 These data are published in the NHVRC’s 2024 Home Visiting Yearbook, which includes participation data from 2023.
Using data from NHVRC, it is possible to estimate how many children under age 3 each state is serving in its home visiting programs, as a percentage of the total population that is under age 3 in families with incomes less than 150% of the federal poverty level (FPL).15
According to data from NHVRC, the reach of home visiting varies considerably across the US. Except for a handful of states, the reach is relatively small . The percentage of families with young children served by evidence-based home visiting programs in 2023 ranged from 25.9% in Kansas to only 1.4% in Nevada (median of 10%). Five states serve more than 20% of their eligible prenatal-to-3 population, and nine states serve less than 5% (national average of 8.8%).
WHAT PROGRESS HAVE STATES MADE IN THE LAST YEAR TO INCREASE ACCESS TO EVIDENCE-BASED HOME VISITING PROGRAMS?
States have substantial latitude in how they fund and implement their home visiting programs. Over the last year, several states took legislative action to enhance their support of evidence-based home visiting programs through new funding streams or increased spending on home visiting programs.
1 State Began Covering Evidence-Based Home Visiting Services Under Medicaid
In the last year, Illinois was the only state that began covering evidence-based home visiting services under Medicaid. The state submitted and received approval for a state plan amendment to provide Medicaid coverage for home visiting services, retroactively effective September 2024.
Home visits will provide health, child development, and parenting education; screening; and care coordination to pregnant and parenting individuals with young children. Qualified providers include programs that are fully accredited or meet standards by their national program offices and are one of the state-approved evidence-based models.
2 States Are in the Process of Covering Evidence-Based Home Visiting Services Under Medicaid
Two states are in the process of providing coverage for evidence-based home visiting services under Medicaid. Nebraska enacted legislation to cover evidence-based home visiting programs under the Medicaid targeted case management benefit, which requires the state to submit a Medicaid state plan amendment before implementation. The bill stipulates that the state match for Medicaid reimbursement must be covered with funds returned to the state from managed care organizations that exceed their medical loss ratio. As of September 2025, Nebraska had not yet submitted a state plan amendment for federal review.
Lawmakers in the District of Columbia successfully enacted legislation in 2024 to require the health care programs run by the District—including Medicaid, the DC HealthCare Alliance Program, and the Immigrant Children’s Program—to cover and reimburse services provided by home visiting programs. The legislation requires that services be offered through an evidence-based program as defined by HomVEE. As of September 2025, the District had not yet submitted its state plan amendment for federal review, a step required for implementation.
1 State Enacted Legislation to Require Private Health Plans to Cover Evidence-Based Home Visiting Services
Legislators in Louisiana enacted a bill to require coverage of evidence-based home visiting services, as defined by HomVEE, by any private health insurance plan in the state that provides benefits for maternity services. The bill requires minimum coverage of at least five visits, starting January 2027.
3 States Considered Partnerships Between Medicaid and Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs
Three states (Iowa, Rhode Island, and Texas) introduced legislation to explore partnerships between their Medicaid and home visiting programs, though none of these proposals passed this session.
- Legislation in Iowa would have given the Department of Health and Human Services approval to seek a waiver to cover home visiting services under Medicaid if it determined doing so would be beneficial.
- The Rhode Island proposal would have added additional requirements to the state’s annual report on home visiting programs, including information on how states have maximized partnerships between Medicaid and home visiting programs.
- Texas’s bill would have required Medicaid coverage of home visiting services and required that managed care organizations in the Medicaid program collaborate with home visiting programs so that if a family loses Medicaid eligibility in the middle of the home visiting program, they can continue to receive home visits.
11 States Continued Investments in Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs
At least 11 states—Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington—continued funding for home visiting programs. Legislators in Georgia expanded their investment to almost $3 million for the state’s pilot program to provide additional home visiting services in at-risk and underserved communities.
Washington legislators appropriated $34.5 million in state funds—maintaining the previous biennium’s allocation—to the Home Visiting Services Account, which pairs public dollars with matching private contributions. Of this funding, about $1.8 million was earmarked to support wage increases and create more equity in contracting among the home visiting provider workforce.
4 States Explored Ways to Improve Access to Home Visiting Services
In Maryland, legislators enacted legislation to establish the Workgroup on Newborn Home Visiting Services, charged with identifying service gaps, potential funding sources, and workforce needs. The group is set to submit a report to the legislature by the end of 2025.
Although ultimately unsuccessful, legislators in California, Maine, and New York introduced bills to better connect families with home visiting programs. California’s legislation would have allowed families who are enrolled in home visiting programs through their participation in CalWORKS, the state’s TANF program, to continue with services even if they lose CalWORKS eligibility. Maine legislators sought to create a study on barriers to a universal referral system to home visiting programs in the state. New York proposed adding home visiting programs to the Health Care and Wellness Education and Outreach Program, which would have allowed for additional and improved outreach to families who may be eligible for services.
Federal Changes to Medicaid May Impact State Medicaid Offerings
In the last year, the federal government passed the 2025 Federal Budget Reconciliation Bill making cuts to federal funding for Medicaid.16 Work to understand the implications of federal policy changes on state budgets is ongoing, though changes are anticipated to have a detrimental effect on state support for evidence-based policies and strategies such as home visiting.
For more information on each state’s progress on evidence-based home visiting programs, find our individual state summaries under Additional Resources below (and here).
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES
View our Policy Impact Calculator, which illustrates how policies, such as state minimum wage, paid family and medical leave, out-of-pocket child care expenses, taxes and tax credits, as well as federal nutrition benefits, interact to impact overall household resources.
NOTES AND SOURCES
- Sandstrom, H. (2019). Early childhood home visiting programs and health. Health Affairs. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20190321.382895/full/
- Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). The ecology of human development. In R. Vasta (Ed.) Six Theories of Child Development (pp. 187–249). London: Kingsley Publishers
- Sweet, M. A. & Appelbaum, M. I. (2004). Is home-visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children. Child Development, 75(5), 1435–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00750.x
- National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. (2015). Supportive relationships and active skill-building strengthen the foundations of resilience [Working paper no.13]. https://46y5eh11fhgw3ve3ytpwxt9r-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/The-Science-of-Resilience2.pdf
- Nievar, M. A., Van Egeren, L. A., & Pollard, S. (2010). A meta-analysis of home visiting programs: Moderators of improvements in maternal behavior. Infant Mental Health Journal, 31, 499–520. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.20269 [Evidence-Based Home Visiting Evidence Review Study D]
- Sweet, M. A. & Appelbaum, M. I. (2004). Is home-visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children. Child Development, 75(5), 1435–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00750.x
- Casillas, K. L., Fauchier, A., Derkash, B. T., & Garrido, E. F. (2016). Implementation of evidence-based home visiting programs aimed at reducing child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse and Neglect, 53, 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.009 [Evidence-Based Home Visiting Evidence Review Study A]
- Lee, H., Crowne, S. S., Estarziau, M., Kranker, K., Michalopoulos, C., Warren, A., Mijanovich, T., Filene, J., Duggan, A., & Knox, V. (2019). The effects of home visiting on prenatal health, birth outcomes, and health care use in the first year of life: Final implementation and impact findings from the Mother and Infant Home Visiting Program Evaluation – Strong Start (OPRE Report #2019-08). Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation. https://www.acf.hhs.gov/opre/resource/effects-home-visiting-prenatal-health-birth-outcomes-health-care-first-year-final-implementation-impact-findings-strong-start
- Filene, J. H., Kaminski, J. W., Valle, L. A., & Cachat, P. (2013). Components associated with home visiting program outcomes: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 132 Suppl 2 (0 2), S100–S109. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1021H [Evidence-Based Home Visiting Evidence Review Study C]
- Sweet, M. A. & Appelbaum, M. I. (2004). Is home-visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children. Child Development, 75(5), 1435–1456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00750.x
- Casillas, K. L., Fauchier, A., Derkash, B. T., & Garrido, E. F. (2016). Implementation of evidence-based home visiting programs aimed at reducing child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse and Neglect, 53, 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.009 [Evidence-Based Home Visiting Evidence Review Study A]
- Filene, J. H., Kaminski, J. W., Valle, L. A., & Cachat, P. (2013). Components associated with home visiting program outcomes: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 132 Suppl 2 (0 2), S100–S109. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1021H [Evidence-Based Home Visiting Evidence Review Study C]
- Filene, J. H., Kaminski, J. W., Valle, L. A., & Cachat, P. (2013). Components associated with home visiting program outcomes: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 132 Suppl 2 (0 2), S100–S109. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-1021H [Evidence-Based Home Visiting Evidence Review Study C]
- NHVRC does not include service data from the following evidence-based programs that impact parenting: Family-Check Up, Healthy Beginnings, Healthy Steps, Intervention Nurses Start Infants Growing on Healthy Trajectories (INSIGHT), Oklahoma’s Community-Based Family Resource and Support Program, and Promoting First Relationships.
- We estimate the percentage served out of the eligible children under age 3, using the NHVRC service data (number of served children under age 3) from 2022 as the numerator, and the Census Bureau’s 2021-2022 American Community Survey data (number of children under age 3 in families with incomes of less than 150% of the FPL) as the denominator. The family income of less than 150% of the FPL was used as a proxy for the high-priority eligibility criteria typically used across home visiting programs (e.g., pregnant women, mothers under 21, single/never married mothers, parents with less than a high school education, and families with incomes below 100% of the FPL).
- KFF. (2025). Health Provisions in the 2025 Federal Budget Reconciliation Bill. KFF. https://www.kff.org/tracking-the-medicaid-provisions-in-the-2025-budget-bill/