Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt. Learn More

Policy History Timelines

The race, gender, and socioeconomic status of intended beneficiaries have played a measurable role in policymaking, particularly influencing eligibility and access to public supports for families of color earning low incomes. Our social policy history timelines highlight the evolution of inequities caused by patterns of exclusionary policymaking.

From Design to Disparities: How Inequitable Access Evolved Over Time

Social and economic inequities have emerged through layered systems of power and social norms, resulting in the inequitable distribution of public resources to certain communities across America today. Though these disparities trace back centuries, the effects of structural inequities have often extended the life cycle of economic precarity across generations.

To understand how we can better design policies that are accessible and effective, we must first understand how inequitable access to public support systems has been sustained.

The timelines reflect content from policy history reports published in December 2025. Scroll through key moments in time and follow the accumulation of inequities in policy design through the years.

Mother holding baby in her arms in bedroom.

The History of Paid Family Leave Policy Timeline

Our analysis illustrates the historical timeline of labor and family policies that shape present-day paid family leave policies. Inequities in the accessibility and affordability of paid family leave have been influenced by narratives that some families (most often families experiencing poverty and families of color) are less deserving of financial support and legal work protections.

As a result of historical policy design, many workers of color remain less likely to meet eligibility requirements for either paid or unpaid leave and are less likely to be able to afford to take time away from work to bond with a new child when available.

Trace the path from past to present and explore the evolution of paid family leave policies.

1600s – 1864

Early America

In both colonial and industrial America, the White, married, nuclear family led by a man was seen as the fundamental unit of an orderly society. By law and custom, a married woman was considered subordinate to her husband and had few individual rights. Under this legal doctrine of coverture, the labor of a married woman and any earnings generated from it were the legal property of her husband (or her father if not married).
1600s – 1864

1865-1913

Post Civil War and Turn of the 20th Century

After the legal system of chattel slavery ended, states and institutions used segregation, racist pseudo-science, intimidation, and violence to maintain a racial caste system. The federal government also forcibly removed many Native American children from their families and placed them in boarding schools. At the same time, the medical field propagated untrue ideas about differences by race and class related to the need for postpartum recovery.
1865-1913

1914-1920s

World War I and the Progressive Era

The Progressive Era in the early 20th century was defined by the labor and women’s movements, which worked to build political power for historically excluded groups and reform exploitative or exclusionary systems. However, institutional racism within these movements meant that political power (and benefits) remained concentrated within White constituencies.
1914-1920s

1930s

The Great Depression and the New Deal

Black workers were “first fired and last hired” when unemployment spiked during the Great Depression. Worker protections codified in the Social Security and National Labor Relations Acts of 1935 and the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 excluded occupations in which Black workers were concentrated.
1930s

1940s-1950s

World War II and Postwar Period

World War II left many new mothers separated from their spouses and extended families and drew many mothers into the workforce. Supports for these parents expanded during the war and quickly contracted when it was over. After the war, wealth transfers such as the G.I. Bill were largely limited to White, middle-class families, which widened the racial wealth gap.
1940s-1950s

1960s-1970s

The Civil Rights Movement and a Changing Workforce

The Civil Rights period saw dramatic increases in labor force participation by Black and White women. Due to discrimination, however, gains in college attendance, professional degree attainment, and higher-wage professional jobs were greatest for White women. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) of 1978 barred pregnancy discrimination in all states, and extended protections for unpaid medical leave for pregnant and postpartum workers in five states with existing Temporary Disability Insurance (TDI) programs.

1960s-1970s

1980s-1990s

Welfare Reform and the Evolution of FMLA

As women’s labor force participation continued to rise, interest in the intersection of work and caregiving responsibilities also increased. The Family Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) offered the first federal protections for parents with a new child to take unpaid leave. However, restrictive eligibility criteria left workers who were disproportionately people of color unprotected. Even among those eligible for federal job protections under the FMLA, most workers lacked the resources to afford even 6 weeks of unpaid leave and Black, Hispanic, and Native American workers are less likely to be eligible for and able to access unpaid leave than their White or Asian counterparts.
1980s-1990s

2000s- Present

Paid Family Leave in the 21st Century

In the 21st century, new paid family leave policies at the state and federal levels suggest the start of a new era for American families. Due to occupational segregation and a patchwork of state policies, workers of color are still more likely to work in unstable or part-time jobs and therefore least likely to receive job-protected, paid leave following a birth, adoption, or foster placement.
2000s- Present
Portrait Of Smiling Female Elementary School Pupil Sitting In Classroom At School

The History of Child Care Policies

Our historical analysis illustrates the throughlines from our country’s earliest child care policies to today’s subsidy systems, with a particular focus on the racial equity of policy design and implementation over time.

In doing so, we found that the attempts to exclude non-White recipients and, if included, limit the generosity of aid, creates unique, inequitable barriers for families of color while also undermining the foundation of the subsidized care system for all families with low incomes.

Move through the moments that shaped inequity in child care policies and see the ripple effects on families today.

1600s – 1800s

Colonial Settlement through Reconstruction

The colonization and subsequent development of the United States was fraught with inequities, including in caregiving dynamics. Enslaved, and later free, Black women often cared for White children, and many Native American children were forcibly enrolled in boarding schools.

1600s – 1800s

1900s – 1920s

The Progressive Era

At the turn of the 20th century, state-funded mothers’ pensions were popularized to allow mothers to stay home and care for their children; yet, mother’s pensions were inequitably implemented, restricting eligibility to the “deserving poor.”

1900s – 1920s

1930s

The Great Depression

The economic collapse in the 1930s spurred the federal government to provide financial assistance, via the Aid to Dependent Children (ADC) program, for mothers with low incomes to stay at home and care for their children. States had significant control in the implementation of ADC, and as the population served became less White, support for the program weakened.

1930s

1940s – 1950s

World War II and Postwar Period

Mothers’ participation in defense work during World War II prompted additional, time-limited federal supports for child care. In the postwar period, increased financial prosperity was largely limited to White families, and the proportion of Black families accessing ADC grew. Despite ADC program goals remaining centered on in-home childrearing, discriminatory state policies and inadequate financial support forced mothers with low incomes, particularly Black mothers, into the workforce.

1940s – 1950s

1960s – 1970s

The Civil Rights Movement

Welfare reform in the 1960s led to the introduction of work incentives and child care subsidies for out-of-home care. The shift away from cash assistance to allow mothers to stay home to care for their children was largely in response to a perceived increase in Black individuals receiving aid under expanded eligibility requirements.

1960s – 1970s

1980s

The Reagan Revolution

Reducing welfare rolls continued to be a central policy goal in the 1980s, largely informed by racist narratives that Black families were taking advantage of the welfare system. For the first time, the Family Support Act made work a requirement and guaranteed child care for AFDC recipients; states were given significant control in implementing both measures.

1980s

1990s – 2010s

Welfare Reform

Welfare reform under President Clinton separated child care subsidies from cash welfare benefits. Existing child care subsidy programs were combined into a single block grant, the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF), which increased states’ control over program implementation; greater control allowed states to set more or less equitable policies concerning eligibility, copayments, etc., without federal interference.

1990s – 2010s

2020 - Present

The COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic raised public awareness of long-standing challenges in the child care sector, resulting in significant allocations of relief funding and the 2024 CCDF rule changes to support a more sustainable and equitable child care system. Even so, states continue to struggle to address access and affordability for families.

2020 - Present

Read the full reports to uncover more gaps in access and outcomes across social policies.

Our analysis of these social policy histories identifies how the race, gender, and socioeconomic status of intended beneficiaries have influenced policy choices through the years and illuminate the real-world implications of inequitable design.

Explore the full policy history reports to gain a deeper understanding of how racial disparities emerged and their ongoing impact.