Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt. Learn More

Implementing a State Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) in Pennsylvania: A Benefit-Cost Analysis

PRINT

Report for the United Way of Pennsylvania

REPORT | B.006.0122

January 2022

Download the full report (PDF)

Download the 1-page research summary (PDF)

Executive Summary

The federal earned income tax credit, or EITC, is one of the most successful anti-poverty programs in the US, lifting 6 million people (including 3 million children) over the poverty threshold each year, reducing the depth of poverty for many others, and boosting the resources of near-poor households who struggle to make ends meet. The majority of states offer a state-level EITC to working households to supplement the federal credit, typically providing a set percentage of a household’s federal benefit. Rigorous research shows that federal and state EITCs increase overall employment and earnings, particularly for single mothers, leading to better economic, social, and health outcomes for families. EITCs benefit state and local governments as well, because increased earnings yield greater tax revenue and reduced spending on public assistance.

Pennsylvania has had its own tax forgiveness program for decades, providing relief to millions of families each year, but the state remains without an EITC. Therefore, some families who struggle financially do not receive tax relief because their income level does not qualify for the current program. A coalition led by the United Way of Pennsylvania is advocating for a refundable state EITC of at least 10% and up to 25% of the federal credit, which can be phased in over time. The current state tax relief program would remain in place under this proposal and families would elect to claim the benefit that offers the greatest tax relief for their household.

This report offers an estimate for the new costs of the proposed refundable state EITC, beyond Pennsylvania’s current expenditures for its existing tax forgiveness program, as well as estimates for the benefits to the state and to families. We estimate that with a 10% state EITC, the average annual benefit per household would be $197, and Black and Hispanic families would receive a greater benefit than the state average. Approximately 10% of all households in Pennsylvania are likely to claim the state EITC and 14% would claim the current tax forgiveness benefit. Therefore, 1 in 4 Pennsylvania households would receive some form of tax relief. Our analysis demonstrates that the annual public benefits of the elective state EITC program would outweigh its costs, with an estimated ratio of approximately 7 to 1 with a 10% credit. The program would improve the quality of life for Pennsylvania’s workers and families, while offering significant returns to the state government through increased economic activity, greater tax revenue, and reduced spending on public assistance and human services programs.

Table of Contents

I. Background and Purpose of Report

II. Costs of Implementing a State EITC Program in Pennsylvania

III. Benefits of the Proposed State EITC Program

IV. Benefits for Marginalized Communities: Race and Ethnicity Groups

V. Local Impact: Pennsylvania Regional Benefits

VI. Conclusion

VII. Appendix


Recommended Citation

Osborne, C., Traish, N., Cunningham Rottas, J. (January 2022). Implementing a State Earned Income Tax Credit in Pennsylvania: A Benefit-Cost Analysis. Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center, Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Vanderbilt University. https://pn3policy.org/resources/implementing-a-state-earned-income-tax-credit-eitc-in-pennsylvania.

© January 2022, Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center, All Rights Reserved. The Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center at Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Vanderbilt University translates research on the best public investments into state policy actions that produce results for young children and society.

Related

Baby held close to their mother's chest

Effective Early Childhood Governance: Lessons Learned from Governance Change

Governance change does not happen overnight, and states rarely accomplish it alone. Drawing on case studies of five states that consolidated their early childhood systems, a new brief from the Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center identifies seven lessons learned, from sustained advocacy to strong, collaborative leadership, that can help state leaders pursue governance change reflecting their own early childhood goals.
Governance change does not happen overnight, and states rarely accomplish it alone. Drawing on case studies of five states that consolidated their early childhood systems, a new brief from the Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center identifies seven lessons learned, from sustained advocacy to strong, collaborative leadership, that can help state leaders pursue governance change reflecting their own early childhood goals.
Little girl smiling

Early Childhood Governance Typologies: Patterns in State Governance Across the Nation

State choices in early childhood governance shape whether families can easily find, access, and use the services their children need. A new brief from the Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center maps how all 50 states and the District of Columbia organize these systems, identifying three governance typologies (whole child, school readiness, and parents' workforce participation) to help leaders align governance structure with their early childhood goals.
State choices in early childhood governance shape whether families can easily find, access, and use the services their children need. A new brief from the Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center maps how all 50 states and the District of Columbia organize these systems, identifying three governance typologies (whole child, school readiness, and parents' workforce participation) to help leaders align governance structure with their early childhood goals.
Mother holding baby close to her chest after delivery

New Research on Medicaid Work Requirements Highlights the Importance of State Policy Choices

As states implement new federal work requirements under OBBBA, several policy choices can help minimize unnecessary coverage loss.
As states implement new federal work requirements under OBBBA, several policy choices can help minimize unnecessary coverage loss.