Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt. Learn More

Benefit-Cost Analysis of a Paid Family and Medical Leave Program in Vermont

PRINT

Paid family and medical leave policies are proven to strengthen families’ economic security, support the health and wellbeing of children and parents, and improve mothers’ labor force participation, among other benefits.

In partnership with the Vermont Paid Leave Coalition, we evaluated a proposed paid family and medical leave program for Vermont to assess the potential impact on families, employers, and the state. The benefit-cost analysis specifically focused on paid bonding (parental) leave as it’s the leave type that has the largest and most rigorous body of causal evidence on child, parental, and family outcomes.

Our estimates indicate that paid bonding leave would generate $11 million in annual net benefits to families, businesses, and the state. Working families with infants would benefit from lower health care and child care costs, increased employment and household income, and direct benefit payments from the bonding leave program. The state of Vermont would benefit from increased sales and income tax revenue, decreased spending on state-sponsored health care and non-parental infant care, and other benefits. The annual societal benefits of bonding leave would outweigh its costs, with an estimated ratio of 6.8 to 1.

Recommended Citation 

Osborne, C., Nair, V., Craig, S., Ellis, H. & Diaz Caserta, V. (2025). Benefit-Cost Analysis of a Paid Family and Medical Leave Program in Vermont. Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center, Vanderbilt University Peabody College of Education and Human Development. 

Acknowledgement 

The authors also thank current and past colleagues for their contributions to the original methodology. 

Related

Baby held close to their mother's chest

Effective Early Childhood Governance: Lessons Learned from Governance Change

Governance change does not happen overnight, and states rarely accomplish it alone. Drawing on case studies of five states that consolidated their early childhood systems, a new brief from the Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center identifies seven lessons learned, from sustained advocacy to strong, collaborative leadership, that can help state leaders pursue governance change reflecting their own early childhood goals.
Governance change does not happen overnight, and states rarely accomplish it alone. Drawing on case studies of five states that consolidated their early childhood systems, a new brief from the Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center identifies seven lessons learned, from sustained advocacy to strong, collaborative leadership, that can help state leaders pursue governance change reflecting their own early childhood goals.
Little girl smiling

Early Childhood Governance Typologies: Patterns in State Governance Across the Nation

State choices in early childhood governance shape whether families can easily find, access, and use the services their children need. A new brief from the Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center maps how all 50 states and the District of Columbia organize these systems, identifying three governance typologies (whole child, school readiness, and parents' workforce participation) to help leaders align governance structure with their early childhood goals.
State choices in early childhood governance shape whether families can easily find, access, and use the services their children need. A new brief from the Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center maps how all 50 states and the District of Columbia organize these systems, identifying three governance typologies (whole child, school readiness, and parents' workforce participation) to help leaders align governance structure with their early childhood goals.
Mother holding baby close to her chest after delivery

New Research on Medicaid Work Requirements Highlights the Importance of State Policy Choices

As states implement new federal work requirements under OBBBA, several policy choices can help minimize unnecessary coverage loss.
As states implement new federal work requirements under OBBBA, several policy choices can help minimize unnecessary coverage loss.