Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit, sed diam nonummy nibh euismod tincidunt. Learn More

Osborne Named an Affiliate of the Institute for Research on Poverty at the University of Wisconsin-Madison

PRINT

Cynthia Osborne, Ph.D.LBJ School of Public Affairs Associate Dean for Academic Strategies and Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center director Dr. Cynthia Osborne has been named an affiliate of the Institute for Research on Poverty (IRP) at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

She joins her fellow scholars at IRP dedicated to producing and disseminating rigorous evidence to inform policies and programs to combat poverty, inequality, and their effects.

IRP specializes in interdisciplinary research that looks into the causes and consequences of poverty and inequality in the United States and the impact of related policies and programs. The Institute was established in 1966 at the university by the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity and given responsibility for reducing poverty in America. In the years since then, the Institute’s affiliates, who represent a variety of disciplines, have formulated and tested basic theories of poverty and inequality, developed and evaluated social policy alternatives, and analyzed trends in poverty and economic well-being.

Osborne is also currently serving on the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) committee Exploring the Opportunity Gap for Young Children Birth through Age 8 and was an appointed member of NASEM Committee to Reduce Child Poverty by Half in Ten Years

Learn more about the Institute for Research on Poverty: https://www.irp.wisc.edu

Related

Baby held close to their mother's chest

Effective Early Childhood Governance: Lessons Learned from Governance Change

Governance change does not happen overnight, and states rarely accomplish it alone. Drawing on case studies of five states that consolidated their early childhood systems, a new brief from the Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center identifies seven lessons learned, from sustained advocacy to strong, collaborative leadership, that can help state leaders pursue governance change reflecting their own early childhood goals.
Governance change does not happen overnight, and states rarely accomplish it alone. Drawing on case studies of five states that consolidated their early childhood systems, a new brief from the Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center identifies seven lessons learned, from sustained advocacy to strong, collaborative leadership, that can help state leaders pursue governance change reflecting their own early childhood goals.
Little girl smiling

Early Childhood Governance Typologies: Patterns in State Governance Across the Nation

State choices in early childhood governance shape whether families can easily find, access, and use the services their children need. A new brief from the Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center maps how all 50 states and the District of Columbia organize these systems, identifying three governance typologies (whole child, school readiness, and parents' workforce participation) to help leaders align governance structure with their early childhood goals.
State choices in early childhood governance shape whether families can easily find, access, and use the services their children need. A new brief from the Prenatal-to-3 Policy Impact Center maps how all 50 states and the District of Columbia organize these systems, identifying three governance typologies (whole child, school readiness, and parents' workforce participation) to help leaders align governance structure with their early childhood goals.
Mother holding baby close to her chest after delivery

New Research on Medicaid Work Requirements Highlights the Importance of State Policy Choices

As states implement new federal work requirements under OBBBA, several policy choices can help minimize unnecessary coverage loss.
As states implement new federal work requirements under OBBBA, several policy choices can help minimize unnecessary coverage loss.